The Pre-ejaculate fluid, madhy, calls for washing and ablution before praying

Answered by Shaykh Hamza Karamali, SunniPath Academy Teacher

Question:

The fluid that flows from a man - it is not urine and not semen, but flows with excitement, and I think the Arabic name is madhi - I have read Hadith of this that the Prophet (PBUH) said that if you find such fluid, you can sprinkle water and perform ablution and then pray! I want to know, I am correct and is my understanding of the Hadith correct?

Answer:

In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful

wa 'alaykum as salam wa rahmatullah

In the Name of Allah, Most Merciful and Compassionate

The Fiqh

Pre-ejaculate (madhy) is a clear, sticky fluid that exits from males and females when they are sexually aroused. It exits in greater quantities from women than from men. The exiting of pre-ejaculate has two main implications:

(1) Pre-ejaculate is filthy (najis): This means that the body parts and clothing that became affected by pre-ejaculate must be purified with water before praying; otherwise, one's prayer will be invalid. Areas affected by most types of filth (such as pre-ejaculate) are purified by first removing all traces of the filth and then pouring water over the area. It is not sufficient to merely sprinkle water as you mention in the question. As such, your understanding of the hadith is incorrect. The correct meaning of the hadith in question is explained below. For a good overview on purifying articles from filth, see:

Removing Baby Filth
http://www.sunnipath.com/resources/Questions/qa00001844.aspx 

(2) The exiting of pre-ejaculate invalidates one's wudu: This means that you must perform ablution after the exiting of pre-ejaculate. If you pray without first performing ablution, your prayer will be invalid. You seem to have correctly understood this point from the hadith.

Note that the exiting of pre-ejaculate does not necessitate a purificatory bath (ghusl).

The Hadith

Much of the fiqh relating to pre-ejaculate is derived from the hadith of our master 'Ali (Allah be pleased with him), who said that he was someone who excreted large amounts of pre-ejaculate. Because he was married to the Lady Fatima (Allah be pleased with her)--the Prophet's (Allah bless him and give him peace) daughter--he felt embarrassed asking him regarding it, so he asked another companion, al-Miqdad b. al-Aswad, to ask him on his behalf. Imam Muslim relates three versions of this hadith in the chapter of madhy. In one version, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) replied, "He should wash (ghasl) his penis and make wudu." In another version, he replied, "It calls for wudu." In a third version, he is related to have said, "Make wudu and do naDh of your private part." This final version is the hadith that you seem to be referring to.

At first glance, a non-scholar will immediately translate the word naDh as "sprinkling." Imam Nawawi, in his commentary on Sahih Muslim, mentions that the word naDh can refer to both "sprinkling" and "washing". He then reconciles between the seemingly conflicting narrations by saying that in this hadith, naDh must be interpreted as "washing" and not "sprinkling."

Imam Nawawi then also mentions that the scholars of hadith have differed in their views regarding the chain of transmission (isnad) of the narration that mentions naDh. This hadith was one of the hadiths of the two sahihs that Imam al-Daraqutni criticized. One of the narrators of the hadith (Makhramah b. Bukayr) narrates from his father and there is disagreement among the scholars of hadith whether or not he actually heard any hadiths from his father. Another indication that points to problems in the chain of transmission is that the hadith has been narrated with a slightly different chain by Nasa'i (which is weak by virtue of being a mursal narration), which hints at the possibility that there might be a hidden defect in this particular narration of the hadith.

In conclusion, this discussion points to the necessity of taking rulings from the scholars of fiqh: not from one's own understanding of certain hadiths. Deriving rulings directly from the primary sources is a daunting task, and if one "goes it alone" without seeing what the scholars of fiqh (represented by the four Sunni schools) have to say about the issue, it is likely that one will fall into error. This is not an error that is excusable, for Allah has commanded us to ask those of knowledge if we ourselves know not.

And Allah knows best.

Hamza.

References: Nawawi, al-Minhaj Sharh Sahih Muslim b. al-Hajjaj [Beirut: Dar al-Ma'rifa], Hadiths #694-696.

MMVIII © Qibla.
All rights reserved
No part of this article may be reproduced, displayed, modified, or distributed without the express prior written permission of the copyright holder. For permission, please submit a request at our Helpdesk.

Now What?

The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, "Knowledge is only through study." While some knowledge can be gained from reading or casually listening to lectures, the best means to gain knowledge is through finding a qualified teacher and then setting up a systematic program of learning. Picking up a book or reading an article and trying to figure things out on our own is no substitute for learning from someone who has a direct link to our living tradition.

Through joining an online class at Qibla, you can benefit from convenient, online courses that will give you access to reliable scholars and our popular curriculum learning tracks. Knowledge gained in these courses will both build your iman and assist you in putting into practice what you learn. Don't give yourself less than you deserve, register today.

Related Links:

  1. Why you'll love our courses
  2. How Qibla courses work (video)
  3. What our students say
  4. Our current available courses